Fathermoh & Harry Craze Win Court Protection Against Black Market Records
On May 27, 2026, Kenyan musicians Fathermoh and Harry Craze secured temporary court protection against Black Market Records.
The Copyright Tribunal in Nairobi issued interim orders stopping the label from exploiting their music catalogues.
Consequently, the tribunal barred the company from claiming ownership, monetising, publishing, or commercialising the artists’ songs.
Additionally, the orders stopped the label from issuing copyright strikes against their digital platforms.
Tribunal Chairperson Issues Urgent Orders
Tribunal Chairperson Elizabeth Lenjo delivered the temporary orders pending a full hearing.
The ruling targeted Black Market Records LLC, Studio Black Market Records Ltd, and director Cedric Singleton.
Additionally, the tribunal certified the matter as urgent because of the serious copyright allegations raised.
Consequently, the label cannot interfere with concerts, performances, or promotional activities linked to the artists.
Fathermoh Demands KSh87.6 Million in Royalties
Fathermoh filed the case through lawyer Adrian Kamotho under Kenya’s Copyright Act.
The artist accused the label of fraud, unlawful enrichment, and misrepresentation.
Additionally, he claimed the company illegally controlled more than 63 songs from his catalogue.
Some disputed songs include Shamra Shamra, Bambi, and Taki Taki.
Consequently, Fathermoh seeks approximately KSh87.6 million in unpaid royalties and damages.
He also accused the label of disrupting his streaming income through repeated copyright strikes.
READ ALSO: Buruklyn Boyz Ignite Drill Rap Feud with 34 Bricks
Harry Craze Challenges Ownership of Solo Music
Harry Craze also accused the label of unlawfully controlling his music catalogue.
The former Rico Gang member argued that ownership claims continued after the group disbanded in December 2023.
Additionally, he accused the company of removing his independent tracks from streaming platforms without permission.
Some affected solo songs reportedly include Matopare and Luku Ni Pyam.
Consequently, Harry Craze seeks approximately KSh5.8 million in copyright damages and unpaid royalties.
Case Sparks Debate Over Artist Exploitation
The dispute has intensified discussions about artist rights within Kenya’s entertainment industry.
Additionally, many musicians continue raising concerns over exploitative international recording agreements.
The case also highlights increasing legal battles involving ownership of digital music catalogues.
Consequently, Kenyan creatives are demanding stronger protection under copyright and intellectual property laws.
Entertainment Industry Closely Watches Tribunal Case
The legal battle has attracted major attention across Kenya’s music industry.
Many artists and fans publicly supported Fathermoh and Harry Craze online after the ruling.
Additionally, digital creators continue debating fairness within modern music distribution contracts.
As the tribunal case proceeds, the final ruling could reshape future music agreements in Kenya significantly.
